> > ...and DRM will dynamically recompile itself every 32 seconds...
>
> ...and thus will spend so much time recompiling itself that there
> is no time to do anything else (since it will inevitably take 33
> seconds to actually perform the compilation).
True, I take this on board, perhaps my devel team can look at an alternative
e.g. a couple of verifying modules.
> Personally, I see DRM as the best thing Microsoft could take under
> their wings, as it's an almost sure-fire bet that any company that
> whole-heartedly embraces it will soon go bust...
I embrace it because like war in Iraq, its gonna happen anyway...
Without a alternative, the government will have to accept
monopoly.
Because they certainly "ain't no good at suing 'em".
Im not intending on using DRM to spread proprietary
works, im gonna use it to protect my confidential documents
and my GPL source.
DRM is a good idea, used only by a bad idea of company.
Nuclear power is good but under bad hands...
> Best wishes from Riley.
> ---
> * Nothing as pretty as a smile, nothing as ugly as a frown.
--- Dean.-- ______________________________________________ http://www.linuxmail.org/ Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr
Powered by Outblaze - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:57 EST