Hello all,
Please apologize:
I checked the code and I finaly noticed
that this is a linuxPPC bug and that the buggy lines haven't
been reported in the main kernel tree.
So I will resend the patch to the LinuxPPC mainteners instead.
I promise I will check better before complaining,
the next time I'll do :=)
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 22:24, James Mayer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 08:24:56PM +0200, Jocelyn Mayer wrote:
> > It seems to me that this was already reported for previous
> > 2.4.21-rc's, but never applied.
> > Here's the patch that make radeonfb compile (and work)
> > on my Ibook:
> >
> maybe it was never applied because you don't cc the 2.4 maintainer (Marcelo
> Tosati)?
>
> ciao, Marc
Ooops, I didn't post this patch before, but I think someone did.
That's the point I wanted to show...
> >
> > 19:06:04.0000
> > 00000 +0200
> > +++ linux-2.4.21-rc6-fixed/drivers/video/radeonfb.c 2003-06-01
> > 20:58:42.0000
> > 00000 +0200
> > @@ -1001,8 +1001,8 @@
> > /* According to XFree86 4.2.0, some production M6's return 0
> > for 8MB. */
> > if (rinfo->video_ram == 0 &&
> > - (pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_RADEON_LY ||
> > - pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_RADEON_LZ)) {
> > + (pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RADEON_LY ||
> > + pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RADEON_LZ)) {
> > rinfo->video_ram = 8192 * 1024;
> > }
>
> Hi,
>
> I can't seem to find PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RADEON_LY or
> PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RADEON_LZ defined *anywhere* in 2.4.21-rc6, and the
> 2.4.21-rc6 version of radeonfb.c compiled just fine for me.
>
> - James
-- Jocelyn Mayer <jma@netgem.com>- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 07 2003 - 22:00:18 EST