On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 04:00:59PM -0700, john stultz wrote:
> All,
>
> Since jiffies didn't necessarily start incrementing at a second
> boundary, jiffies/HZ doesn't increment at the same moment as
> xtime.tv_sec. This causes one second wobbles in the calculation of btime
> (xtime.tv_sec - jiffies/HZ).
>
> This fix increases the precision of the calculation so the usec
> component of xtime is used as well. Additionally it fixes some of the
> non-atomic reading of time values.
>
>
> This is a fix for bugme bug #764.
> http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=764
>
>
> Let me know if you have any comments
Might it not be cheaper to start jiffies at the 1 second
boundary or with a value that simulates that?
-- ________________________________________________________________ J.W. Schultz Pegasystems Technologies email address: jw@pegasys.wsRemember Cernan and Schmitt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 07 2003 - 22:00:22 EST