On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 at 11:39:45 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
>In message <200306091014.h59AEnU08591@adam.yggdrasil.com> you write:
[A report of a bug in kernel/module.c, which Rusty has already
submitted a patch for, followed by a mistaken second bug report on my part:]
>> By the way, there also seems to be a bug in the
>> 2.5.70-bk12/kernel/module.c changes where mod->percpu is left unitialized
[...]
>Something is badly wrong: look in include/linux/module.h and you'll
>see the initialization of __this_module (which becomes mod). By
>leaving the .percpu member uninitialized, it will be initialized to
>NULL.
You're right. My misunderstanding was the result of flaky serial
console cable, which I've now replaced. Sorry for the confusion.
Adam J. Richter __ ______________ 575 Oroville Road
adam@yggdrasil.com \ / Miplitas, California 95035
+1 408 309-6081 | g g d r a s i l United States of America
"Free Software For The Rest Of Us."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 22:00:30 EST