--On Thursday, June 12, 2003 14:00:14 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
wrote:
> And this does require that ->nopage be entered with page_table_lock held,
> and that it drop it.
I think that's a worse layer violation than referencing inode in
do_no_page. We shouldn't require that the filesystem layer mess with the
page_table_lock.
Dave
======================================================================
Dave McCracken IBM Linux Base Kernel Team 1-512-838-3059
dmccr@us.ibm.com T/L 678-3059
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 22:00:34 EST