Re: pci_domain_nr vs. /sys/devices

From: Ivan Kokshaysky (ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru)
Date: Tue Jun 17 2003 - 04:41:56 EST


On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 02:49:48PM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> And only creates /proc/bus/pci entries for the first domain.

Err, this definitely breaks X on alpha. On small and mid-range
machines we always have pci_domain_nr(bus) == bus->number.
Practically, it's only Marvel where we could overflow an 8-bit
bus number.

> Finally there was some shuffling required to make pci_bus_exists work
> (passing in a pci_bus *, ->sysdata and ->number must be initialised
> before calling it). There are some uses of pci_bus_exists in x86 that
> will need updating.
>
> Thoungts?

Looks good to me, except this (see above):

> + /* Backwards compatibility for domain 0 only */
> + if (pci_domain_nr(dev->bus) != 0)
> + return 0;

How about this instead?

        /* Backwards compatibility for first N PCI domains. */
        if (pci_domain_nr(dev->bus) > PCI_PROC_MAX_DOMAIN)
                return 0;

PCI_PROC_MAX_DOMAIN could be defined in asm/pci.h (255 on alpha), default 0.

Ivan.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 23 2003 - 22:00:20 EST