> From: Marcelo Tosatti [mailto:marcelo@conectiva.com.br]
> Andrew,
>
> I've changed my mind with respect to the ACPI merge in 2.4.22.
>
> I'm willing to do it in .22 timeline.
>
> I feel its better if we do the merge in separate parts, not in a huge
> patch.
>
> What you think ?
Hi Marcelo,
Great!
I've been maintaining the ACPI branch in a bk tree for the past year, so
there are 100+ changesets nicely commented. Just doing a bk pull from
that would be the best way to maintain checkin comments. bk pull
http://linux-acpi.bkbits.net/linux-2.4-acpi .
I can also export the changesets if you'd like to review them, but they
won't apply cleanly to the tip, since they originally were against a
much older version.
Another option would be to take the raw .diff and re-carve it by files
modified - the arch/i386 changes, the interpreter changes, the old ospm
removal, the new ospm addition, all the headers moving to include/acpi.
I'm certainly willing to do that but that would lose the changelogs and
patch attributions.
Thanks -- Regards -- Andy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 23 2003 - 22:00:23 EST