RE: [patch] setscheduler fix

From: Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky (inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com)
Date: Thu Jun 19 2003 - 21:38:57 EST

Next message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] Make gcc3.3 Eliminate Unused Static Functions"
Previous message: Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky: "RE: [PATCH 2.5.72] Fix boot deadlock on MTRR main.c:ipi_handler"
Maybe in reply to: Robert Love: "[patch] setscheduler fix"
Next in thread: Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky: "RE: O(1) scheduler seems to lock up on sched_FIFO and sched_RR ta sks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> From: Robert Love [mailto:rml@tech9.net]
>
> Here is my patch. It is the same idea as Joe's. Is there a better fix?

Fixes my sched-hang.c

Ińaky Pérez-González -- Not speaking for Intel -- all opinions are my own
(and my fault)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] Make gcc3.3 Eliminate Unused Static Functions"
Previous message: Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky: "RE: [PATCH 2.5.72] Fix boot deadlock on MTRR main.c:ipi_handler"
Maybe in reply to: Robert Love: "[patch] setscheduler fix"
Next in thread: Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky: "RE: O(1) scheduler seems to lock up on sched_FIFO and sched_RR ta sks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 23 2003 - 22:00:31 EST