At 12:29 PM 6/20/2003 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
>On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 07:32, Andreas Boman wrote:
> >
> > Basicly, for normal usage this kernel is acting *very* well here.
>
>Great! Thanks for doing this testing. I've attached a patch with the updated
>figures and cc'ed lkml for others to test.
Thud is still much more effective at starvation than stock (zero decay
during run phase), and a parallel kernel build still goes to
max-interactive virtually instantly.
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 23 2003 - 22:00:32 EST