Re: [patch] fix wrong uptime on non-i386 platforms

From: Alex Goddard (agoddard@purdue.edu)
Date: Sat Jun 21 2003 - 00:20:16 EST

Next message: BalaKrishna Mallipeddi: "(no subject)"
Previous message: Tugrul Galatali: "2.5.72 + ACPI 20030619 still won't boot (was Re: 2.5.71 won't boot, ACPI related)"
In reply to: Tim Schmielau: "[patch] fix wrong uptime on non-i386 platforms"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Tim Schmielau wrote:

> Here are most of the missing wall_to_monotonic initializations that the
> non-i386 architectures still need to pick up.
> This should fix the reported uptime inconsistencies.
>
> Disclaimer: completely untested, since I don't have (most of) the hardware.

Incidently, I haven't had the absurdly high uptime bug strike again since
the first time it happened. I'll try out your patch as soon as I get a
chance.

-- 
Alex Goddard
agoddard@purdue.edu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: BalaKrishna Mallipeddi: "(no subject)"
Previous message: Tugrul Galatali: "2.5.72 + ACPI 20030619 still won't boot (was Re: 2.5.71 won't boot, ACPI related)"
In reply to: Tim Schmielau: "[patch] fix wrong uptime on non-i386 platforms"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 23 2003 - 22:00:35 EST