Re: [PATCH] loop.c - part 1 of many

• Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] loop.c - part 1 of many"
• Previous message: Vojtech Pavlik: "Re: Crusoe's performance on linux?"
• Maybe in reply to: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "[PATCH] loop.c - part 1 of many"
• Next in thread: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] loop.c - part 1 of many"
• Reply: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] loop.c - part 1 of many"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

hch:

> Once you start touching loop_{,un}register_transfer please also get
> rid of the array in favour of a linked list..

Why do you think that might be a good idea? General elegance?
The array is legacy only - it will not grow.
It has length 20, and only three entries are frequently used:
18 for CryptoAPI, 16 for loopAES, 0 for no encryption.

Andries
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] loop.c - part 1 of many"
• Previous message: Vojtech Pavlik: "Re: Crusoe's performance on linux?"
• Maybe in reply to: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "[PATCH] loop.c - part 1 of many"
• Next in thread: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] loop.c - part 1 of many"
• Reply: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] loop.c - part 1 of many"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 23 2003 - 22:00:40 EST