[Q] loop.c

• Next message: Gerhard Mack: "Re: Now that the 0 Penguin"
• Previous message: Henning P. Schmiedehausen: "Re: [OT] Re: Troll Tech [was Re: Sco vs. IBM]"
• In reply to: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "[PATCH] loop.c - part 1 of many"
• Next in thread: Andries Brouwer: "Re: [Q] loop.c"
• Reply: Andries Brouwer: "Re: [Q] loop.c"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Replying to Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl:
> Below a patch for loop.[ch]. It can be applied.

Please, can anybody review the possibility of making offset LARGEFILE-capable?
I was stuck in it couple of time, yes, not yet understood what actually
happening inside loop.c to just blindly add new ioctl and do loff_t
internally.

Maybe I'm too stupid for this and it have more elegant solution than coding
what I've said ...

- --
Paul P 'Stingray' Komkoff Jr // http://stingr.net/key <- my pgp key
 This message represents the official view of the voices in my head
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQE+9ydlyMW8naS07KQRAiocAKCVSom0DtFtvEb3bbeWY1uda2iJkgCgu8E2
IoAERy2wzdhbc2Q5Z7zpFqs=
=DbIz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Gerhard Mack: "Re: Now that the 0 Penguin"
• Previous message: Henning P. Schmiedehausen: "Re: [OT] Re: Troll Tech [was Re: Sco vs. IBM]"
• In reply to: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "[PATCH] loop.c - part 1 of many"
• Next in thread: Andries Brouwer: "Re: [Q] loop.c"
• Reply: Andries Brouwer: "Re: [Q] loop.c"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 23 2003 - 22:00:41 EST