On Wednesday 09 July 2003 11:18, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Thomas Schlichter <schlicht@uni-mannheim.de> wrote:
> > This gives following compile error when compiling the kernel with APM
> > support for UP:
> >
> > arch/i386/kernel/apm.c: In function `apm_bios_call':
> > arch/i386/kernel/apm.c:600: error: incompatible types in assignment
> > arch/i386/kernel/apm.c: In function `apm_bios_call_simple':
> > arch/i386/kernel/apm.c:643: error: incompatible types in assignment
> >
> > The attached patch fixes this...
>
> Seems complex. I just have this:
>
>
> diff -puN arch/i386/kernel/apm.c~cpumask-apm-fix-2 arch/i386/kernel/apm.c
> --- 25/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c~cpumask-apm-fix-2 2003-07-08
> 23:09:23.000000000 -0700 +++ 25-akpm/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c 2003-07-08
> 23:28:50.000000000 -0700 @@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ static inline void
> apm_restore_cpus(cpum
> * No CPU lockdown needed on a uniprocessor
> */
>
> -#define apm_save_cpus() 0
> +#define apm_save_cpus() CPU_MASK_NONE
> #define apm_restore_cpus(x) (void)(x)
>
> #endif
I thought about this one, too, but I wasn't sure if gcc is able to optimize
away the assignment and the local cpumask_t variable with this oneliner...
But for me it is OK, too...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:30 EST