Re: [2.5 patch] remove CONFIG_SERIAL_21285_OLD

From: Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: Sun Jul 13 2003 - 17:46:15 EST

Next message: Ingo Oeser: "Re: Style question: Should one check for NULL pointers?"
Previous message: Adrian Bunk: "Remove CONFIG_H8 in 2.5?"
In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "[2.5 patch] remove CONFIG_SERIAL_21285_OLD"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 12:41:11AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> CONFIG_SERIAL_21285_OLD depends on the non-existent option
> CONFIG_OBSOLETE, IOW it's not selectable, and the help text says "This
> is obsolete and will be removed during later 2.5 development.".
>
> Is the patch below to remove this option OK?

Absolutely fine by me.

-- 
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ingo Oeser: "Re: Style question: Should one check for NULL pointers?"
Previous message: Adrian Bunk: "Remove CONFIG_H8 in 2.5?"
In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "[2.5 patch] remove CONFIG_SERIAL_21285_OLD"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:49 EST