Re: woes with 2.6.0-test1 and xscreensaver/xlock

From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Wed Jul 16 2003 - 14:32:42 EST

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:16:27 PDT, "Randy.Dunlap" said:

> Alan says that it's fixed in RH 9 IIRC, but no details about the
> problem or the fix.... ? Sounds a little like a userspace (library
> or syscall) issue. Someone mentioned PAM also.
 
I suspect it's the same bug that wedged PAM when the "child runs first"
patch made its appearance:

* Mon Apr 23 2001 Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin@redhat.com>

- merge up to 0.75
- pam_unix: temporarily ignore SIGCHLD while running the helper
- pam_pwdb: temporarily ignore SIGCHLD while running the helper
- pam_dispatch: default to uncached behavior if the cached chain is empty


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 22:00:26 EST