On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:23:07 -0700 David S. Miller wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 14:14:57 -0400 (EDT)
> Glenn Fowler <gsf@research.att.com> wrote:
> > named sockets seem a little heavyweight for this application
> I think it'll be cheaper than unnamed unix sockets and
> groveling in /proc/*/fd/
> And even if there is a minor performance issue, you'll more than get
> that back due to the portability gain. :-)
named unix sockets reside in the fs namespace, no?
so they must be linked to a dir before use and unlinked after use
the unlink after use would be particularly tricky for the parent process
implementing
cmd <(cmd ...) ...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 22:00:50 EST