Re: raid5 autoselecting a slower checksum function

From: Tomas Szepe (szepe@pinerecords.com)
Date: Mon Jul 28 2003 - 15:54:38 EST

Next message: Roland Dreier: "Re: DMA not supported with Intel ICH4 I/O controller?"
Previous message: Dave Barry: "Re: [Bug 999] New: Problem with the /dev/ptmx file"
In reply to: Bruce Harada: "Re: raid5 autoselecting a slower checksum function"
Next in thread: Bruce Harada: "Re: raid5 autoselecting a slower checksum function"
Reply: Bruce Harada: "Re: raid5 autoselecting a slower checksum function"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> [bharada@coral.ocn.ne.jp]
>
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 18:17:00 +0300 (EEST)
> Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > Why doesn't it select p5_mmx if it is 37% faster than pIII_sse?
>
> This has come up before - see :
>
> http://hypermail.idiosynkrasia.net/linux-kernel/archived/2003/week01/1894.html

Fair enough, but wouldn't it be more appropriate if the kernel printed
a message like "SSE present, good. No need to try the other checksumming
methods" in this case?

-- 
Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Roland Dreier: "Re: DMA not supported with Intel ICH4 I/O controller?"
Previous message: Dave Barry: "Re: [Bug 999] New: Problem with the /dev/ptmx file"
In reply to: Bruce Harada: "Re: raid5 autoselecting a slower checksum function"
Next in thread: Bruce Harada: "Re: raid5 autoselecting a slower checksum function"
Reply: Bruce Harada: "Re: raid5 autoselecting a slower checksum function"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:37 EST