> From: Rusty Russell [mailto:rusty@rustcorp.com.au]
> > Last but not least weren't we moving towards a more modular kernel with
> > early userspace loading things from initrd as needed? Removing existing
> > module functionality, however broken it may be, seems to me a step
> > backward in this regard.
>
> Not really. Adding modules is required. Removing them is a more
> dubious goal, and if we didn't already have it, I know we'd balk at
> doing it.
Can I add that it is really desirable to remove modules when developing
drivers? [and so to avoid reboots when loading new code?].
Iñaky Pérez-González -- Not speaking for Intel -- all opinions are my own (and my fault)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:38 EST