Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> > So this looks OK, yes?
>
> I suppose boomerang_interrupt itself is OK.
> Spending 104 ms in IRQ 0, 31 ms in IRQ 11, and
> 44 ms in IRQ 14 is not at all OK. I was hoping
> to get under 200 microseconds for everything.
I misread that.
Last time I checked (which was about 18 months ago) the maximum
interrupts-off time on a 500MHz desktop-class machine was 80 microseconds.
Something is broken there. Do you have another machine to sanity check
against?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:42 EST