Re: [PATCH] Inline vfat_strnicmp()

From: OGAWA Hirofumi (hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp)
Date: Thu Jul 31 2003 - 08:52:23 EST

Next message: Mike Dresser: "Re: Disk performance degradation"
Previous message: Con Kolivas: "Re: [PATCH] O11int for interactivity"
In reply to: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: [PATCH] Inline vfat_strnicmp()"
Next in thread: David Weinehall: "Re: [PATCH] Inline vfat_strnicmp()"
Reply: David Weinehall: "Re: [PATCH] Inline vfat_strnicmp()"
Reply: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: [PATCH] Inline vfat_strnicmp()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Denis Vlasenko <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> writes:

> On 27 July 2003 19:33, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> > Ren <l.s.r@web.de> writes:
> >
> > > the function vfat_strnicmp() has just one callsite. Inlining it
> > > actually shrinks vfat.o slightly.
> >
> > Thanks. I'll submit this patch to Linus.
>
> Just to deinline it in some months?
>
> Come on, automatically inlining static functions with
> just one callsite is a compiler's job. Don't do it.

Unfortunately "gcc version 3.2.3 20030415 (Debian prerelease)"
doesn't, at least.

-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mike Dresser: "Re: Disk performance degradation"
Previous message: Con Kolivas: "Re: [PATCH] O11int for interactivity"
In reply to: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: [PATCH] Inline vfat_strnicmp()"
Next in thread: David Weinehall: "Re: [PATCH] Inline vfat_strnicmp()"
Reply: David Weinehall: "Re: [PATCH] Inline vfat_strnicmp()"
Reply: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: [PATCH] Inline vfat_strnicmp()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:49 EST