> On Thursday 31 July 2003 17:05, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>> you're using node_to_cpu_mask for ia64 ... others were using
>> node_to_cpumask (1 less "_"), so this doesn't build ...
>
> Ooops, you're right, of course. Sorry about this mistake :-(
np - was easy to fix up ;-) I did run some benchmarks on it ...
low end SDET seemed highly variable, but otherwise looked OK.
If I have only 4 tasks running on a 16x (4x4), what's the rate
limit on the idle cpus trying to steal now?
M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:52 EST