Re: ptrace or procfs for gdb?

From: Zack Brown (zbrown@tumblerings.org)
Date: Fri Aug 01 2003 - 09:43:12 EST

Next message: ooyama eiichi: "Re: RAW or BLK in 2.4.21"
Previous message: Chip Salzenberg: "Re: nfs-utils-1.0.5 is not backwards compatible with 2.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Marx,

The linux-kernel mailing list is the best place for these kinds of
questions. (CCed)

Good luck,
Zack

On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 09:41:40PM +0800, Marx wrote:
> I look over your "kernel Traffic".
> Now, May I discuss something about procfs with you?
>
> Why does Linux support gdb with ptrace, not procfs?
>
> I've developed debugger for servel years,I prefer procfs rather than
> ptrace.

-- 
Zack Brown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: ooyama eiichi: "Re: RAW or BLK in 2.4.21"
Previous message: Chip Salzenberg: "Re: nfs-utils-1.0.5 is not backwards compatible with 2.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 22:00:16 EST