Re: Re: What's the timeslice size for kernel 2.6.0-test2, IA32?

From: Mark Mielke (mark@mark.mielke.cc)
Date: Fri Aug 01 2003 - 13:34:50 EST

On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 02:04:46PM -0230, Stephen Anthony wrote:
> It would be great if sleeps were 1ms accurate instead of 10ms. It would
> make synchronization code a lot easier.

Doesn't this depend on what HZ you define for the kernel?

If you want 1ms sleep, just set HZ to 1000HZ+, and give your process a
high priority?

mark 

-- 
mark@mielke.cc/markm@ncf.ca/markm@nortelnetworks.com __________________________
.  .  _  ._  . .   .__    .  . ._. .__ .   . . .__  | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/    |_     |\/|  |  |_  |   |/  |_   | 
|  | | | | \ | \   |__ .  |  | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__  | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

  One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all
                       and in the darkness bind them...

                           http://mark.mielke.cc/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 22:00:17 EST