Re: Interactive Usage of 2.6.0.test1 worse than 2.4.21

• Next message: Tomas Szepe: "[TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two"
• Previous message: Con Kolivas: "Re: [PATCH] O13int for interactivity"
• In reply to: Martin Konold: "Interactive Usage of 2.6.0.test1 worse than 2.4.21"
• Next in thread: Bernd Schubert: "Re: Interactive Usage of 2.6.0.test1 worse than 2.4.21"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 07:04, Martin Konold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when using 2.6.0.test1 on a high end laptop (P-IV 2.2 GHz, 1GB RAM) I notice
> very significant slowdown in interactive usage compared to 2.4.21.

Please, upgrade to the latest 2.6.0-test kernel, as there are a lot of
people working on the CPU scheduler and interactivity. As of this mail,
it's 2.6.0-test2-bk4. If you prefer, you can also test 2.6.0-test2-mm4
(Andrew Morton patches on top of 2.6.0-test2).

This way, you can help us in improving the interactive feeling of future
2.6 kernels.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Tomas Szepe: "[TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two"
• Previous message: Con Kolivas: "Re: [PATCH] O13int for interactivity"
• In reply to: Martin Konold: "Interactive Usage of 2.6.0.test1 worse than 2.4.21"
• Next in thread: Bernd Schubert: "Re: Interactive Usage of 2.6.0.test1 worse than 2.4.21"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 22:00:27 EST