Re: Interactive Usage of 2.6.0.test1 worse than 2.4.21

From: Martin Konold (martin.konold@erfrakon.de)
Date: Tue Aug 05 2003 - 16:29:40 EST

Next message: Samuel Flory: "2.4.22-pre10 ACPI kennel oops"
Previous message: Tomas Szepe: "[PATCH] clarify why DMA gets disabled on broken drives"
In reply to: Rahul Karnik: "Re: Interactive Usage of 2.6.0.test1 worse than 2.4.21"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Am Dienstag, 5. August 2003 15:37 schrieb Rahul Karnik:

Hi,

> If disk is involved, your problem might simply be the incorrect
> readahead value. Try "hdparm -a 512".

This improved the situation noticeably while still beeing slower than 2.4.21.

I will test more recent kernels later tonight.

Regards,
-- martin

Dipl.-Phys. Martin Konold
e r f r a k o n
Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker
Nobelstrasse 15, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
fon: 0711 67400963, fax: 0711 67400959
email: martin.konold@erfrakon.de

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Samuel Flory: "2.4.22-pre10 ACPI kennel oops"
Previous message: Tomas Szepe: "[PATCH] clarify why DMA gets disabled on broken drives"
In reply to: Rahul Karnik: "Re: Interactive Usage of 2.6.0.test1 worse than 2.4.21"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 22:00:30 EST