devinit

• Next message: Russell King: "[PATCH] PCMCIA IRQ stuff"
• Previous message: Michael Buesch: "Re: [2.6] system is very slow during disk access"
• In reply to: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH] trivial 2.4/2.6 PCI name change/addition"
• Next in thread: Greg KH: "Re: devinit"
• Reply: Greg KH: "Re: devinit"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Greg KH wrote:
> I've applied the 2.6 patch to my trees and will send it on to Linus in a
> few days, thanks.

Speaking of PCI... are we gonna have to zap __devinit too? Another
option is to think of add-new-pci-ids-on-the-fly as a CONFIG_HOTPLUG
feature, which should(?) maintain the current __devinit semantics: no
re-probes.

OTOH, __devinit already is a no-op for CONFIG_HOTPLUG cases (read: most
everybody), so I wonder if we care enough about __devinit anymore? I
used the same logic to support __devinitdata removal, after all.

        Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Russell King: "[PATCH] PCMCIA IRQ stuff"
• Previous message: Michael Buesch: "Re: [2.6] system is very slow during disk access"
• In reply to: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH] trivial 2.4/2.6 PCI name change/addition"
• Next in thread: Greg KH: "Re: devinit"
• Reply: Greg KH: "Re: devinit"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 22:00:35 EST