Re: [PATCH] Nick's scheduler policy v12

[Martin J. Bligh]

> Backboost is gone so X really should be at -10 or even higher.

Wasn't that causing half the problems originally? Boosting X seemed
to starve xmms et al. Or do the interactivity changes fix xmms
somehow, but not X itself? Explicitly fiddling with task's priorities
seems flawed to me.

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/