Re: 2nd proc not seen

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 11:13:21AM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Problem #1 is that physical CPU numbering isn't dense. This is not a bug.
> Problem #2 is that the kernel's internal dense-logical-to-sparse-physical
> numbering was deleted in 2.5.23 or thereabouts.
> Hence NR_CPUS is basically impossible to use reliably in 2.6 unless we
> reintroduce cpu_logical_map[].

We should be able to at least boot them, since we program logical ID's
ourselves. If you're relying on knowing physids at runtime you'll need
cpu_logical_map[].


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/