Hans Reiser <reiser@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:why not? It is correct therefor....
do you think schultz's arguments about why it is wrong are correct? They seem well thought out to me.
Well given that you've renamed the file, you do want the backup program to
pick up the "new" file. But it'd be a pretty lame backup program which was
fooled by a missing ctime update.
Yes, John has a point but we're not going to go and change all the other
filesystems (are we?).