Re: [PATCH] 3/3 Dynamic cpufreq governor and updates to ACPI P-state driver

[Dominik Brodowski]

Vetoed.

cpufreq_dynamic is too generic, there are different approaches == different
governors in the work which are all "dynamic".

	Dominik

On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 02:50:06PM -0700, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> Me too, because it would be consistent with the other ones; i.e. how the
> user perceives them.

On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 01:47:49PM -0700, Moore, Robert wrote:
> 
> I would vote for "cpufreq_dynamic"
> 
> Bob

On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 04:17:04PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Could you name it cpufreq_demand? We have enough
> TLAs as is.
> 				Pavwl

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/