Re: kernel 2.6t9 SATA slower than 2.4.20

[Shaun Savage]

Hi

I have removed the IDE SiI driver now the hdparm buffered disk read are 
now 15M again. So you are right the IDE does give better performance but 
the SCSI SATA does need to be enabled. I Think ;\

Now I am trying to iptables working, then SELinux

Thanks
Shaun


Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 01:08:46PM -0500, Bob Johnson wrote:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > The Sata driver worked well on my siimage, but lost around 30%-40% performance
> > according to tiobench.
>
>
> This is to be expected -- I use a "sledgehammer fix" for the Maxtor and
> Seagate errata -- each transfer is limited to 15 sectors.
>
> When I get a chance to clean up the SiI driver, the performance will
> indeed increase by a large amount.
>
> For now, for Silicon Image, I recommend using the
> drivers/ide/pci/siimage.c -- assuming it works for you, of course.
>
> The libata Silicon Image driver is marked with CONFIG_BROKEN because it
> is fairly easy to lock it up (I need ack some more interrupts).
>
> 	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/