RE: Question on SIGFPE

[Sreeram Kumar Ravinoothala]

Hi Mr Johnson,
	Thanks for the mail and sorry for pestering you. Actually the
call __setfpucw is not visible anywhere. Should I use 
 _FPU_SETCW(cw) instead of that?

Thanks and Regards
SReeram

---Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed people can
change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has. -- Copied
from a mail
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard B. Johnson [mailto:root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 6:56 PM
To: Sreeram Kumar Ravinoothala
Cc: Magnus Naeslund(t); Linux kernel
Subject: RE: Question on SIGFPE


On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Sreeram Kumar Ravinoothala wrote:

>
> Hi Mr Johnson,
>     Thanks for the mail. Actually I see that there is no fpu_control.h

> in my src.
>
> Thanks and Regards
> SReeram

With more recent C runtime libraries, the header is
/usr/include/fpu_control.h instead of /usr/include/i386/fpu_control.h

Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.4.22 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips).
            Note 96.31% of all statistics are fiction.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/