Re: Di-30 non working [bug 967]

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Sat Nov 01 2003 - 18:23:22 EST


Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Noticed by Stuart_Hayes@xxxxxxxx:
>
> I've noticed that, in the 2.6 (test 9) kernel, the "cmd" field (of type int)
> in struct request has been removed, and it looks like all of the code in
> ide-tape has just had a find & replace run on it to replace any instance of
> rq.cmd or rq->cmd with rq.flags or rq->flags.

Nasty.

> @@ -193,6 +193,11 @@ enum rq_flag_bits {
> __REQ_PM_SUSPEND, /* suspend request */
> __REQ_PM_RESUME, /* resume request */
> __REQ_PM_SHUTDOWN, /* shutdown request */
> + __REQ_IDETAPE_PC1, /* packet command (first stage) */
> + __REQ_IDETAPE_PC2, /* packet command (second stage) */
> + __REQ_IDETAPE_READ,
> + __REQ_IDETAPE_WRITE,
> + __REQ_IDETAPE_READ_BUFFER,
> __REQ_NR_BITS, /* stops here */
> };

This takes us up to about 28 flags; we'll run out soon.

Probably it is time to split this into generic and private flags, as we did
with bh_state_bits. The scope of the "private" section needs to be
defined: maybe "whoever created the queue"?

blk_dump_rq_flags() will need updating. Probably change it to only decode
the "generic" flags, and print "bit XX" for the remainders.

Your patch forgot to update rq_flags[] btw.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/