Re: virt_to_page/pci_map_page vs. pci_map_single
From: Jes Sorensen
Date: Tue Nov 04 2003 - 04:51:44 EST
>>>>> "David" == David Mosberger <davidm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Jes> Hmmm, my brain has gotten ia64ified ;-) It's basically the normal
Jes> mappings of the kernel, ie. the kernel text/data/bss segments as
Jes> well as anything you do not get back as a dynamic mapping such as
Jes> ioremap/vmalloc/kmap.
David> I don't think it's safe to use virt_to_page() on static kernel
David> addresses (text, data, and bss). For example, ia64 linux
David> nowadays uses a virtual mapping for the static kernel memory,
David> so it's not part of the identity-mapped segment.
Mmmm good point, I stand corrected. It doesn't really make sense to do
it anyway, but maybe it's worth underlining in the doc if it hasn't
been done so already.
Cheers,
Jes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/