Re: 2.6.0-test9-mm2

[Bradley Chapman]

Mr. Morton,

This patch: +drm-agp-module-dependency-fix.patch

has broken the radeon DRM driver under 2.6.0-test9-mm2. Enclosed is an e-mail I
sent to the dri-devel sourceforge list:

<snip>

I'm having problems using te DRI radeon driver in the 2.6.0-test9-mm2
kernel tree. When X is started, the kernel outputs these messages:

[drm:radeon_cp_init] *ERROR* radeon_cp_init called without lock held
[drm:radeon_unlock] *ERROR* Process 1083 using kernel context 0

The driver did not do this under 2.6.0-test9-mm1.

Interesting parts of dmesg (under 2.6.0-test9-mm2):

Linux agpgart interface v0.100 (c) Dave Jones
agpgart: Detected an Intel i845 Chipset.
agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 439M
agpgart: AGP aperture is 64M @ 0xec000000
[drm] Initialized radeon 1.9.0 20020828 on minor 0

I am using XFree86-4.3.0-42 from Fedora Core.

</snip>

Diffing the drivers/char/drm trees produces this, which I assume is the patch
you applied:

diff -urN linux-2.6.0-test9-mm1/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h
linux-2.6.0-test9-mm2/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h
--- linux-2.6.0-test9-mm1/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h     2003-10-17
22:42:52.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.0-test9-mm2/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h     2003-11-05
08:45:46.000000000 +0000
@@ -37,8 +37,8 @@
 #if __REALLY_HAVE_AGP


-#define DRM_AGP_GET (drm_agp_t *)inter_module_get("drm_agp")
-#define DRM_AGP_PUT inter_module_put("drm_agp")
+#define DRM_AGP_GET symbol_get(agp_drm)
+#define DRM_AGP_PUT symbol_put(agp_drm)

 /**
  * Pointer to the drm_agp_t structure made available by the agpgart module.

I've had some responses from dri-devel so far, but right now I'm running
2.6.0-test9-mm1, which works perfectly fine.

What now?

TIA

Brad

=====
Brad Chapman

Permanent e-mail: kakadu_croc@xxxxxxxxx

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/