Re: 2.6-test6: nanosleep+SIGCONT weirdness

[Denis]

On Saturday 08 November 2003 22:32, Denis wrote:
> > > That nanosleep restart seems to be broken, and quite frankly,
> > > looking at the mess in kernel/posix-timers.c I'm not all that
> > > surprised. The code is total and absolute crap. I have no idea
> > > how it's even supposed to work.
> >
> > I'd suggest just removing the regular nanosleep() emulation from
> > there. The clock_nanosleep() restart is likely still broken, but at
> > least this way the _regular_ nanosleep() system call works
> > correctly, and fixing clock_nanosleep() is likely easier since the
> > restart stuff doesn't have to worry about _which_ system call it
> > should restart.
> >
> > Denis, does this work for you?
>
> Does not seem to work, same symptoms 8(

Ok I retested with pristine test9+patch and it works.
-- 
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/