RE: 2.4.22 SMP kernel build for hyper threading P4
From: Brown, Len
Date: Sun Nov 23 2003 - 15:14:51 EST
> Am I missing a step to build a smp kernel for hyper threading?
Yes -- below.
> Hmm... Let's have a look. I started by loading the
> kernel-2.4.20-i686-smp.config file that came with the RH9 distro into
> xconfig. I just turned on ntfs and a couple of other things and saved.
> The comparision is strange. My new config file has:
>
> # CONFIG_ACPI is not set
>
> however the RH9 config file has:
>
> # CONFIG_ACPI is not set
> # CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG is not set
> # CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_ACPI is not set
> # CONFIG_ACPI_HT_ONLY is not s
> CONFIG_ACPI_BUSMGR=m
> CONFIG_ACPI_SYS=m
> CONFIG_ACPI_CPU=m
> CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON=m
> CONFIG_ACPI_AC=m
> CONFIG_ACPI_EC=m
> CONFIG_ACPI_CMBATT=m
> CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=m
> CONFIG_ACPI_RELAXED_AML=y
Use "make oldconfig" to re-write your .config and delete stale junk and
options whose depencencies make no sense. For example, the ACPI drivers
will go away if CONFIG_ACPI is not enabled.
For 2.4.22, try this:
CONFIG_ACPI=y
By itself for full ACPI -- which includes HT.
And this way to limit it to just HT:
CONFIG_ACPI=y
CONFIG_ACPI_HT_ONLY=y
Note that this config scheme proved too confusing and in 2.4.23 and
2.6.0 CONFIG_ACPI_HT_ONLY goes away, and you'll get enough HT to enable
ACPI even without CONFIG_ACPI, as long as you specify CONFIG_SMP in 2.4
or CONFIG_X86_HT=y in 2.6.
> So am I wasting my time with HT?
Measure the performance of something that matters to you before/after
and then you can decide based on objective information.
Cheers,
-Len
Ps. If you run ACPI on 2.4.22 -- we support a patch supplying the latest
ACPI code for that release here:
http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/patches/release/
2.4.22/ This includes the 2.4.23 config changes above, among other
fixes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/