Re: BUG (non-kernel), can hurt developers.

[Linus Torvalds]

On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
>
> Note  to hackers. Even though this is a lib-c bug

It's not.

It's a bug in your program.

You can't just randomly use library functions in signal handlers. You can
only use a very specific "signal-safe" set.

POSIX lists that set in 3.3.1.3 (3f), and says

	"All POSIX.1 functions not in the preceding table and all
	 functions defined in the C standard {2} not stated to be callable
	 from a signal-catching function are considered to be /unsafe/
	 with respect to signals. .."

typos mine.

The thing is, they have internal state that makes then non-reentrant (and
note that even the re-entrant ones might not be signal-safe, since they
may have deadlock issues: being thread-safe is _not_ the same as being
signal-safe).

In other words, if you want to do complex things from signals, you should
really just set a flag (of type "sigatomic_t") and have your main loop do
them. Or you have to be very very careful and only use stuff that is
defined to be signal-safe (mainly core system calls - stuff like <stdio.h>
is right out).

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/