Re: include/linux/version.h

From: Gene Heskett
Date: Tue Dec 02 2003 - 14:13:54 EST

On Tuesday 02 December 2003 13:35, Stefan J. Betz wrote:
>Hello People,
>i have found some wrong thing in include/linux/version.h
>On my System i have Kernel 2.6.0-test10 & 2.6.0-test11, but in
>include/linux/version.h i see:
>#define UTS_RELEASE "2.6.0-test9"
>correct where:
>#definde UTS_RELEASE "2.6.0-test11" (for Linux Kernel
> 2.6.0-test11)...
>Here is a little "patch":
>diff -Nru linux-2.6.0-test11/include/linux/version.h
> linux-2.6.0-test11-fixed/include/linux/version.h ---
> linux-2.6.0-test11/include/linux/version.h Tue Dec 2 19:21:22 2003
> +++ linux-2.6.0-test11-fixed/include/linux/version.h Tue Dec 2
> 19:22:06 2003 @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
>-#define UTS_RELEASE "2.6.0-test9"
>+#define UTS_RELEASE "2.6.0-test11"
> #define LINUX_VERSION_CODE 132608
> #define KERNEL_VERSION(a,b,c) (((a) << 16) + ((b) << 8) + (c))
>I know that this is not a very usefull fix, but i think 2.6.0 should
> be BugFree (TM) :-)
>Greeting Betz Stefan

Humm, where did you get your srcs from? include/linux/version.h reads
2.6.0-test11 here...
>I know that my english is not realy good, but any tipp how i can
> learn better english is welcome...

An occasional miss-spelled word (tipp is really spelled tip) doesn't
break our comprehension, do carry on.

Cheers, Gene
AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M
Athlon1600XP@1400mhz 512M
99.27% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at