Re: XFS for 2.4

From: Eric Sandall
Date: Tue Dec 02 2003 - 19:14:24 EST

Quoting Tomas Szepe <szepe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Dec-02 2003, Tue, 16:01 -0200
> Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Its too late for it to be included in 2.4. Use 2.6 or a modified 2.4 tree.
> A: Looking good, come back later, though.
> B: Ok.
> A: Come back later.
> B: Ok.
> A: Come back later.
> B: Ok.
> A: Come back later.
> B: Ok.
> A: Sorry, you're too late.
> B: W--What?
> A: You heard me. (Also I don't like your shoes.)
> (Sounds a bit like Monty Python to me, can't help it.)

You know, that's what I've been thinking this whole time. Almost sounds like
someone has a grudge against XFS (or something/someone related to XFS).

Just my non-technical opinion.


PGP Key Fingerprint: FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91 FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61

Version: 3.12
GCS/E/IT$ d-- s++:+>: a-- C++(+++) BL++++VIS>$ P+(++) L+++ E-(---) W++ N+@ o?
K? w++++>-- O M-@ V-- PS+(+++) PE(-) Y++(+) PGP++(+) t+() 5++ X(+) R+(++)
tv(--)b++(+++) DI+@ D++(+++) G>+++ e>+++ h---(++) r++ y+

Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric@xxxxxxxxxx | | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU #196285 |

This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at