Re: XFS for 2.4

[Bernd Eckenfels]

In article <3FCE8D7C.4070704@xxxxxxxxxx> you wrote:
> are really problematic when 2.4 is a *must be stable* .

you mean stable as in "NUMA"?

I can see, that SGI had not the best track in the world in an open
development model. But it is realy true that XFS is the longest maintained,
nearly non intrusive patch which is pending for 2.4. Besides: most
distributions ship it anyway AFAIK.

Greetings
Bernd
-- 
eckes privat - http://www.eckes.org/
Project Freefire - http://www.freefire.org/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/