Re: Linux 2.4 future
From: Ian Kent
Date: Thu Dec 04 2003 - 01:24:16 EST
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Matthias Andree wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Dec 2003, Ian Kent wrote:
> > > It's fragile currently, and if there are changes that make the beast
> > > solid, I'm all for it, and the whole discussion can be killed right here
> > > because it's a "bugfix" in that case. After all, autofs4 is a
> > > pre-something stuff and going "gold" is certainly a fix.
> > And that would be 4.1.0-beta3 you are talking about right?
> > Perhaps you could tell me about your problems and I'll put them on my
> > growing todo list for 4.1.1.
> I'd need to find and evaluate your 4.1.0-beta works first. Oops, I've
> got it, I should look into
> http://www.de.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/autofs/v4/ :-)
> Being used to a different directory layout, I looked into the testing
> directories and didn't notice there was an actual 4.0.0 version. Wee.
The 4.0.0 release has only a few bug fixes and is not greatly different
Please use 4.1.0-beta3 unless it's 4.1.0 by the time you get it.
And we should end this off topic thread now I guess.
,-._|\ Ian Kent
/ \ Perth, Western Australia
*_.--._/ E-mail: raven@xxxxxxxxxx
v Web: http://themaw.net/
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/