Re: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?

[Shawn Willden]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 05 December 2003 07:03 am, Ryan Anderson wrote:
> Compile it.
> Run the resulting executable (ignoring the case law that says copying
> into ram is a copy under copyright law)

That case law can be safely ignored in the US, since it was superseded by 
real law, passed in 1980.  Per section 117 of Title 17 of the US Code:

- ----------------
(a) Making of Additional Copy or Adaptation by Owner of Copy. â 
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, it is not an infringement 
for the owner of a copy of a computer program to make or authorize the 
making of another copy or adaptation of that computer program provided:

	(1) that such a new copy or adaptation is created as an essential step
	in the utilization of the computer program in conjunction with a machine
	and that it is used in no other manner, or
- ----------------

So copies to disk and RAM that are "an essential step in the utilization of 
the computer program" are non-infringing.

	Shawn.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/0LRwp1Ep1JptinARAjrbAJ0RAa2axjrFABHgG1loqmxa6KTn0ACcCz1s
Q+DC9COjk+uv+FqdZ8kTg+g=
=N1sB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/