On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 03:09:10PM +0200, Mika Penttil? wrote:And that would explain my confusion in the first place...I don't have the hardware, so feel free to submit a patch to someone responsible for this area if you like... Anyway thanks for your explanations!
and later in same function :
phys_cpu_present_map |= apicid_to_phys_cpu_present(m->mpc_apicid);
but _not_
phys_cpu_present_map |= apicid_to_phys_cpu_present(logical_apicid);
as one would expect (and would make it identical to 2.6 behaviour).... A bug?
You may very well have just debugged an issue I've had with 2.4 on
the things. =)