Hello Trond,-
I apologize for the delay in responding.
On Friday 28 November 2003 01:23, Trond Myklebust wrote:
So then the correct thing to do is indeed to wrap the call to
locks_unlock_delete() with an fget()/fput() pair, and then to remove
the test for fl_pid in locks_same_owner().
We then need to fix lockd so that it generates correct fl_owners for
its locks...
Let me see if I can get that right.
I looked at your patch carefully
(http://www.fys.uio.no/~trondmy/src/Linux-2.4.x/2.4.23-rc1/linux-2.4.23-01-posix_race.dif)
and I think it would fix the problem completely.
Thanks,
--
Akinobu Mita
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/