Re: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?

[Oliver Hunt]

Linus Torvalds wrote:
...
> There's a fundamental difference between "plugins" and "kernel modules":
> intent.
...

The key difference between a plugin and a module(from my understanding 
of plugins in browser/application sense) is how information is passed.

Says we have the flash plugin for some random browser, say BrowserApp 
1.01, now the browser comes across a flash file, now it calls the flash 
plugin, passing both the file, and the graphics context the plugin can 
draw to.  Flash does it's rendering and then shoves it's output to the 
canvas: that's all it can do, it may make a request (say, 
browser::getURL) but that's about it, and the browser can always ignore it.

Now there is competitor to BrowserApp known as BrowserOS, instead of 
plugins it has modules.  Now, when BrowserOS comes across a flash file 
it loads it's flash module and passes the url, at which point the module 
takes over, and allocates a graphics context for it to draw to(see it 
controls what happens, rather than the otherway round).  Now say the 
module wants to load a webpage it now tells the address bar to change, 
then it makes internal changes (loads the new url, etc), that the 
browser _cannot_ stop, it is effectively part of the program...

--Oliver

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/