Re: [2.4][PATCH] Xeon HT - SMT+SMP interrupt balancing

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 17:44, Ken wrote:

> I have attempted user space alternatives -- irq_balance-0.06 and 
> smp_affinity via sysctrl.  The former seems to "blindly" affine an IRQ 
> to a single logical CPU, which in my case, puts the timer and eth3 on 
> CPU0 and it gets "overloaded" while the others are mostly idle.

1) This got fixed in version 0.07
2) You are talking a whopping 100 irq's per second, which is like about
no interrupts... I doubt you can find a scenario where 100 irq's per
second matter.... ;)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part