Re: RFC - tarball/patch server in BitKeeper

From: Larry McVoy
Date: Mon Dec 15 2003 - 10:43:36 EST


On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 10:31:04PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> One thing that I've wished for in the past which looks like it *might*
> be trivial to do is to grab a raw version of the patch you already
> put out in HTML format, eg if I surf down changesets and get to a page
> like this:
>
> http://linus.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/patch@xxxxxx?nav=index.html|ChangeSet@-2w|cset@xxxxxx

We can do that and we will, it's just not hit the top of the priority list.
Given past discussions on this list I had thought there was a strong need
for a way to trivially track any BK tree without BK, maybe I misunderstood
what was being asked.

There isn't any reason we can't do both.
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/