Re: RFC - tarball/patch server in BitKeeper

[Matthew D. Pitts]

> The implication you made was that certain other people
> are violating 
> your license by exporting changesets publicly. If that is true, then
> that is highly relevant to this list. kernel.org, for example would
> have to remove changeset information such as
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/cset/

In my opinion, what is here is nothing more than information that most 
likely does not contain anything that would violate the BK license. The 
check-in comments could easily have been take from the bkbits site 
and put into HTML code, and there is a gzipped patch that could simply 
be gotten through use of BK. Larry, if I'm wrong about any of this, please
 feel free to tell me.
> -Tupshin
Matthew D. Pitts

> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/