On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:27:57PM -0600, Linda Xie wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:07:22PM -0600, Linda Xie wrote:
diff -Nru a/fs/sysfs/symlink.c b/fs/sysfs/symlink.c
--- a/fs/sysfs/symlink.c Sun Dec 14 21:19:29 2003
+++ b/fs/sysfs/symlink.c Sun Dec 14 21:19:29 2003
@@ -42,7 +42,10 @@
struct kobject * p = kobj;
int length = 1;
do {
- length += strlen(p->name) + 1;
+ if (p->k_name)
+ length += strlen(p->k_name) + 1;
+ else
+ length += strlen(p->name) + 1;
Shouldn't this just be:
length += strlen(kobject_name(p)) + 1;
That is correct. But here is my concern: Some of the callers of sysfs_create_link()
set p->name instead of p->k_name. So for them, the length calculated using kobject_name(p) will be incorrect. Correct me if I am wrong.
Well if a kobject only uses the .name field, .k_name will point to it
(see kobject_add()), so the kobject_name() call will work in the above
case (as it should always do.) Actually that if (p->k_name) statement
will always be true because of this fact :)
This lets people like the edd driver which does:
snprintf(edev->kobj.name, EDD_DEVICE_NAME_SIZE, "int13_dev%02x", edd[i].device);
still work properly. Ideally, callers like this should change to use
the kobject_set_name() function, but there's no rush.
thanks,
greg k-h